2002 UCLA J.L. & Tech. Notes 28

Securities Fraud, Market Manipulation, and the Internet
by Christine Souhrada

Securities Fraud:

The greater accessibility of the internet has brought a number of benefits to investors: real-time access to company information, and less expensive stock trades through on-line brokers (just to name two). However, the internet has also proven to be an effective tool for perpetrating securities fraud. The types investment opportunities that have been fraudulently offered over the internet run a spectrum of business enterprises that seem to be limited only by a perpetrator's imagination. Such securities offerings have been made in everything from transactions in foreign currency1 and investments in virtual (on-line) casinos2, to securities in Costa Rican coconut plantations3 and eel farms 4. Almost every conceivable communication method offered by the internet has been used to defraud investors including unsolicited "spam" e-mail, web pages, web discussion forums, chat rooms, news groups, and on-line news letters.5 It has been estimated that internet-related stock fraud is the second most common form of investment fraud, costing investors approximately $10 billion per year.6 The frauds being perpetrated on the internet, the making of material misstatements or omissions to induce investors to purchase securities7, are the same as those which have existed since the passage of the first federal securities laws nearly 80 years ago. The internet is simply a new vehicle with which to perpetrate these frauds.

Market Manipulation:

The opportunity to violate securities laws on the internet is not limited to issuers. Even common stockholders can opt to violate the securities laws by using the internet to manipulate the markets. The key to market manipulation is causing enough investors to buy the target company's stock by disseminating false information to artificially inflate the stock price. The manipulator then sells his own stock at the inflated price before the market realizes that the information is false. The investors who bought based on the false information often lose a substantial amount of the money they invested.8 Market manipulation often targets what are termed "microcap" stocks, these are generally securities in thinly capitalized companies which are traded over-the-counter. Their low price, small trading volume, and scarcity of issuer information, make the price of microcap stocks easier to move up or down. The internet has become an effective tool for market manipulators as it allows them to disseminate false information about a company to massive numbers of investors quickly, easily, and at negligible cost.9

The ease with which the internet allows almost anyone to manipulate the market was demonstrated by Jonathan Lebed. Lebed, using a number of fictitious names, and employing hundreds of internet postings and mass e-mails to disseminate false information about and inflate the price of nine different stocks, made over $272,000 by selling his own shares at the inflated prices. Using the fictitious names, he was able to pose as hundreds of different independent investors, making the false information he was circulating more credible, the entire time concealing that he was only one person, and, most stunning of all, that he was only a 15-year-old high school junior. 10

Regulatory Response:

In 1989 the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) created the Office of Internet Enforcement11 to deal with the special challenges encountered in combating securities fraud perpetrated via the internet. The office is proactive, performing internet surveillance searching for securities fraud, and executing coordinated nationwide internet-related securities investigations and prosecutions targeting specific types of violations, termed "enforcement sweeps."12 The office has also utilized the public in combating internet-related securities fraud by educating the public about identifying and avoiding on-line frauds and has set up a complaint center where members of the public can report possible securities violations.13

The SEC also coordinates its efforts with other federal and state agencies, including the US Department of Justice14, the Federal Bureau of investigation15, the Federal Trade Commission, the US Secret Service, and regulatory agencies of individual states. The problem of internet-related securities fraud is being independently addressed by state regulatory agencies as well. The California Department of Corporations, for instance, has its own Internet Enforcement Division.16 The problem is also being addressed by self-regulatory organizations such as the New York Stock Exchange, the National Association of Securities Dealers, and the North American Securities Administrators Association,17 which coordinate efforts with federal and state regulators.18

 

Footnotes

1. SEC v. Forex Asset Management, LLC, Lit. Rel. No. 16055, 1999 SEC LEXIS 262 (Feb. 8, 1999).
2. SEC v. Internet Casino Sports Gaming, LLC, Lit. Rel. No. 16025, 1999 SEC LEXIS 112 (Jan. 13, 1999).
3. SEC v. Scott A. Frye, Lit. Rel. No. 15139, 1996 SEC LEXIS 3016 (Oct. 29, 1996).
4. SEC v. Daniel Odulo, Lit. Rel. No. 14616, 1995 SEC LEXIS 2186 (Aug. 24, 1995).
5. http://www.sec.gov/news/testimony/testarchive/1999/tsty0699.txt
6. http://www.fbi.gov/hq/cid/fc/ec/about/about_scf.htm
7. See §17(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933, and §10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as promulgated in Rule 10b-5.
8. Alternatively, the manipulator may attempt to "short" the market by inducing investors to sell to effect an artificially depressed market price.
9. http://www.sec.gov/news/testimony/testarchive/1999/tsty0699.txt
10. http://www.cnn.com/2000/LAW/law.and.business/09/21/teen.trader.ap/index.html; http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2000-135.txt
11. http://www.sec.gov/divisions/enforce/internetenforce.htm
12. http://www.sec.gov/divisions/enforce/internetenforce.htm
13. http://www.sec.gov/complaint.shtml
14. http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/fraud/Internet.htm; http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/fraud/Internet.htm#What%20Is%20The%20Department%20Doing
15. http://www.fbi.gov/hq/cid/fc/ec/about/about_scf.htm; http://www1.ifccfbi.gov/index.asp
16. http://www.corp.ca.gov/pub/cyber.htm; http://www.corp.ca.gov/pressrel/nr0115.htm
17. http://www.nasaa.org/nasaa/enforcement/enforcement_overview.asp
18. http://www.sec.gov/news/testimony/testarchive/1999/tsty0699.txt

 

 

 

 

 

 


Disclaimer: UCLA School of Law neither monitors nor controls the information contained on this web page or on other web sites to which it is linked.