The Supreme Court's decision in Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc. clarifies the reach of the established doctrine of exhaustion and creates an ancillary expansion of that doctrine that I would call simultaneous exhaustion. In comparison to classic exhaustion, which generally establishes that patent rights are "exhausted" with respect to an individual item when the item is subject to an unconditional sale by the patentee, the doctrine of simultaneous exhaustion establishes that the same mechanism applies to related patents under certain specific and discrete conditions. While the doctrine thus takes the form of a clarification and expansion of existing and established patent law, it is noticeably distinct in its reach and its consequent implications to the computer technology and biotechnology industries. Thus, discussion of Quanta as a mere explanation of the doctrine of exhaustion falls short of according the holding its due import.

« Hide abstract

To protect the rights and opportunities of trademark holders, the American government has limited the rights and opportunities of innocent domain name users. This Article argues that the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act unconstitutionally violates the commercial speech doctrine. Though the Act directly advances a substantial governmental interest, the statutory construction of the Act is more extensive than necessary. The Article therefore recommends that the Act be amended so that its scope applies only to true cybersquatters.

« Hide abstract

This paper advances the notion that procedure should be restored to the high road from which it has been diverted in the last decades. In the 1960s and 70s, the traditional approach, which subordinated procedure as ancillary to substance, was replaced by a much richer understanding of procedure's significance. But this trend was reversed largely as a result of the drive for efficiency that has dominated the courts and their alternatives. One of the side effects of this development has been the channeling of technology's impact on dispute resolution procedure to what I term the "efficiency paradigm."

While the technological revolution of the recent decades has had a far reaching impact on substantive legal arrangements and doctrines, it has had only a limited effect on procedure, where it has typically been neglected or narrowly viewed as efficiency-enhancing. In this fashion, procedure has been pushed back to its subsidiary role with regards to substance. This paper advances a more comprehensive view, which underscores the potential of new technologies to advance a wide range of procedural values (including efficiency) under a "multi-dimensional learning paradigm."

These themes are explored in the arena of digital technology in the courtroom and, specifically, by focusing on a particular case study - that of the Israeli court computerization, which is simultaneously caught up in the efficiency paradigm and creates the basis for a shift to the alternative approach that is promoted in this article.

« Hide abstract